L. E. Vila Lladosa, M. Caballer Tarazona

Human Capital theory predicts individual wages from years of education and work experience (Mincer, 1974). Nonetheless, substantial differences in sample wage (mean & variance) for groups of graduates suggest that clusters (hierarchy) may be relevant to predict wages with graduate survey data. Two theoretical models compete to predict graduate wages for ML analysis of the response variable. First, signaling theory predicts individual wages from HE credentials; that is, wage reflects the average labor-market value of diverse types of educational credentials (assumption: credential as screening device for workers productivity). Second, segmentation theory predicts individual wages combining HE credentials and job segments. Wage reflects the average labor-market value of diverse HE credentials within diverse job segments (assumption: credentials as criteria to assign workers to job segments).

Keywords: productivity, segmentation, signalling

Scheduled

SI-DE-1 Invited Session. Data Analysis in Education
September 6, 2019  11:20 AM
I3L10. Georgina Blanes building


Other papers in the same session


Cookie policy

We use cookies in order to be able to identify and authenticate you on the website. They are necessary for the correct functioning of it, and therefore they can not be disabled. If you continue browsing the website, you are agreeing with their acceptance, as well as our Privacy Policy.

Additionally, we use Google Analytics in order to analyze the website traffic. They also use cookies and you can accept or refuse them with the buttons below.

You can read more details about our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.